9/11 was also a signal that humans were failing to transform millennials intelligence-centric education

 chat with me chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk if you are interested in saving millenials intellignce (see game  below) or the media crisis of why an earlier generation missed chance to unite in recociling 9/11. Specufically, - why didnt 9/11 unite online peoples launching number 1 web round futirising continuous open survey of what 9/11 meant to trust-flows at every different locality  How can we expect teachers of any grade to help kids progress if  space for common human sense is not accessuble for celebration of human good. (That includes artificial teachers (oe emerging agents) when around 2020 metachats were born rounf analsysing proceedings of digital humanity to date)

Or if you want to check why the 21st C UN believed  it sensible to assemvle annually in the middle of New York (well 1st and 46th)  to ask every human  to chat avout 5 prioruity goals every day as most deeply (human) and fiundtional to connecting with a lots of other innovation wishes (now that we live with 10**18 more technology that kids grew up with in mud 20th C schools

Befeire we discuss this gameboard, my understanding us that our elders who designed the united nations wished 21st c generations to value these foundational interactions (chat with mne if you dusagree- I need to learn to!)

goal 2 end starvation and dhydration is the most urgent correction any of us can make if we see a human starving or dying of lack of clean water (anither explanation of goal 2 is these are energy inouts humans need; while it is true that sice 1760 scots teased the world with engines/artificial energy hungry devices - there's no point building the greatest engines in the world if there are no human s left (more precisely nature would see no point in our species on earth if we did that)

goal 3 asks what other basic health services does every community need enough caring people action so that everyone gets fair chance to live prodictvely to their 60s (or beyond)

goal 4 asks whether we (paremts anf all of us) can design learning so that people dont fail from simple things like  illiteracy - if someone is illiterate age 6 or pver it only takes about 30 hour intervention to cure that; basuc education systems make a list of age relevant interventions including how to help every kid enter intelligent digital world not social media's most ignorant or hate filling ines

goal 5 - seriously id any place relegated half of its people (women or any half) onto less productive status than the other half, it should be obvioius that will generate a place that expomentially collapses

I am not sure if 1 is a goal - its more a sysrem that celebrates cultures i9n which everyone's savings integrates 2 to 5 as well as other needs - basucally however much your philosophy believes adults must take responsibility for theit own lives and not expect endless handouts- there is some age from 0 to 11 or whenever your place makes schooling mandatiry where the responsibility is communal ; if you dont agree with that then you dont agree with any of the safety aims of multilateral system design which emerged after world war 2 to prevent there ever being more world wars

--- back to a first look at transforming to inteligence centric education -which 13 human guides to untelligence are integral to ai agency saving humanirty?